You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.
| Technology Tech Savvy Discussions |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| WT Advanced Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,071
Rep Power: 83616 | Hunting for Gravity Waves In the plains of eastern Washington state and in a Louisiana forest lie two peculiar L-shaped buildings. Their skinny arms stretch 4 kilometers across the land, and inside each arm, a flashlight-sized laser beam bounces back and forth. The facilities, called LIGO, are feeling for tremors in the fabric of space-time, called gravitational waves. Einstein predicted the existence of "gravity waves" 86 years ago. He also predicted they would be too small to measure. So far, he's been right. LIGO, short for Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, just finished taking its first round of data this week, and failed to detect any gravity waves. But, as NPR's David Kestenbaum reports, physicists are confident LIGO will reveal the waves. Gravity waves are akin to sound waves. When a baby cries, sound waves spread through the air of the house, breaking the calm. Einstein predicted that just as air can vibrate, so can space and time. In fact, Einstein said that every time anything moved -- from the moon orbiting the Earth to one car bumping into another -- the fabric of space-time vibrates, sending out gravitational waves. "The problem is that it's so hard to detect it that we have to go find something really incredibly violent to have a hope of detecting it," says Barry Barish, a California Institute of Technology physicist who works with the LIGO project. One such event might be the collision of black holes. But even then, the resulting space quake would typically be so slight as to cause the distance between Earth and the nearest star to shiver by about the width of a hair. That's why no one has yet detected a gravity wave, says Kestenbaum. LIGO's strategy is to split a laser beam down two long, steel vacuum tubes. A mirror at each end bounces the laser back, and machines measure any difference when the beams reunite. A gravity wave passing over the Earth, says Barish, will slightly compress space in one tube and stretch it in the other. One mirror will move slightly forward, and the other slightly back. That tiny movement is what they're trying to measure. For a two-week period that ended Tuesday, LIGO scientists bounced the laser up and down the tubes. The data turned up no evidence of gravity waves. The team says they will likely have to upgrade their equipment before it is truly sensitive enough to detect the first gravity wave. Critics say the $296 million spent to build LIGO could have been better spent on telescopes. Advocates of the project maintain LIGO is a kind of telescope -- one that will someday be able to search the distant universe in an entirely new way. In Depth Browse the NPR archives for more stories on investigations into space. Other Resources • Explore what scientists know about space and the universe at the Smithsonian's Universe Web site. • LIGO is a joint project between the California Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Visit the project's main Web site. • The LIGO Hanford facility in Washington. • The LIGO Livingston Observatory in Louisiana. • The LISA mission is a space-based attempt to detect gravity waves. • NASA's Origins Education Forum, a gateway to the agency's exploration into the structure and evolution of the universe. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| The best things in life are dirty Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: No-Name City, CA Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: Yes
Posts: 2,493
Rep Power: 186656 | Seems to me that one would need to establish a background measurement first in order to measure larger changes. Tough to do when one can't establish the existence of waves first. Kinda like the chicken and egg question with out knowing what a chicken is or that it lays eggs. Perhaps zero gravity would help since the earths gravity would be its own baseline which is most likely much stronger than faint gravity waves. Fun to consider... |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Does a misanthrope hate themself? Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Santa Cruz Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 408
Rep Power: 3681 | Re: Hunting for Gravity Waves I don't think there's a good chance of detecting gravity waves on earth very soon. I don't know who decided that Louisana swampland a nice stable substrate for building one of the most sensitive instruments in history, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me. The money would be better spent on a space based setup (LISA), which has been discussed but never budgeted as of yet. I hope they actually build launch it someday. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Budtender Deluxe Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: In the Saucer of course! Co-Op: YES Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 5,934
Rep Power: 0 | Re: Hunting for Gravity Waves Quote:
Einstein was tutored by one of my predecessors ya know! | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| gravity , hunting , waves |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |