You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.
| Political Discussion Politics outside of mmj belong here. Failure to act in a civil manner will lead to restriction from this forum. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Stoned Immaculate Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Canoga Park, Fool Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,879
Rep Power: 113264 | Support Troops Swelling U.S. Force in Afghanistan Additional Deployments Not Announced and Rarely Noted President Obama announced in March that he would be sending 21,000 additional troops to Afghanistan. But in an unannounced move, the White House has also authorized -- and the Pentagon is deploying -- at least 13,000 troops beyond that number, according to defense officials. The additional troops are primarily support forces, including engineers, medical personnel, intelligence experts and military police. Their deployment has received little mention by officials at the Pentagon and the White House, who have spoken more publicly about the combat troops who have been sent to Afghanistan. The deployment of the support troops to Afghanistan brings the total increase approved by Obama to 34,000. The buildup has raised the number of U.S. troops deployed to the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan above the peak during the Iraq "surge" that President George W. Bush ordered, officials said. The deployment does not change the maximum number of service members expected to soon be in Afghanistan: 68,000, more than double the number there when Bush left office. Still, it suggests that a significant number of support troops, in addition to combat forces, would be needed to meet commanders' demands. It also underscores the growing strain on U.S. ground troops, raising practical questions about how the Army and Marine Corps would meet a request from Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan. Defense experts said the military usually requires that thousands of support troops deploy for each combat brigade of about 4,000. That, in turn, exacerbates the strain on the force, in part because support troops are some of the most heavily demanded in the military and are still needed in large numbers in Iraq. "There are admittedly some challenges over the next 10 to 12 months as we are downsizing in Iraq, and therefore any schedule for increasing in Afghanistan might have to be more gradual," said Michael E. O'Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Pentagon and White House officials have not publicized significant deployments of support troops. For example, when Bush announced the Iraq surge, he spoke only of 20,000 combat troops and did not mention the approximately 8,000 support troops that would accompany them. When Gen. David H. Petraeus announced that the surge would end, he spoke only of the withdrawal of the combat units because he needed to retain many of the support troops in Iraq. On Afghanistan, White House and Pentagon spokesmen differed over exactly what the president has approved. Obama announced in a March 27 speech that he was approving 21,000 troops, and a White House spokesman said that the president did not approve any other increases before or after. Asked for more details on the troop authorizations, spokesman Tommy Vietor said the Pentagon was better suited to provide such "technical information." Defense officials, however, acknowledge that the request for 21,000 troops has led to the authorization of more forces. "The 21,000 are only combat forces, and when the combat forces go in, there are a certain amount of additional forces that are required," said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, who signs the deployment orders, had military officials identify last spring the entire scope of the increase and agreed that he would consult with Obama again if the Pentagon sought to go above that, Whitman said. "Obama authorized the whole thing. The only thing you saw announced in a press release was the 21,000," said another defense official familiar with the troop-approval process. It's a two page article, but ya get idea. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| WT Regular Join Date: Jun 2009 Co-Op: yes Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 7592 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Thank u great & informative thread as always. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| hello Join Date: Jan 2007 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 470
Rep Power: 17291 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack The general is asking for another giant amount on top of these men and women. (40000 to 60000 according to different websites) poor leadership.... something on tonight http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/ Last edited by contract.dude; 10-13-2009 at 08:43 AM.. Reason: the frontline program thats on tonight.. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Stoned Immaculate Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Canoga Park, Fool Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,879
Rep Power: 113264 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack I did not expect Obama to start wrapping this mess up. We will be stuck there for years. People have connected some Saudi Nationals hijacking planes to peasent farmers in Afghanistan. The Afghan people are sick of us, the topography is impossible, and insurgents will continue to wreak havoc. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Stoned Immaculate Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Canoga Park, Fool Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,879
Rep Power: 113264 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
But a girl can HOPE can't she????? Actually, in light of recent events, I guess not. How long do ya think we'll be in there? Another 5 years, 10, 15? Sigh. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Depends on Iran. We very well might have to leave Afghanistan if the war hawks succeed and draw us into Iran. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| I'm living for the night Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: East Pacific Coast Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 3184 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack War with Iran isn't going to happen. Not American troops anyway. Israel vs. Iran seems likely though. Almost seems like Russia is blocking sanctions simply to hasten the Israeli preemptive attack. If that happens, the price of oil skyrockets again; which benefits Russia's huge oil industry. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| I'm living for the night Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: East Pacific Coast Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 176
Rep Power: 3184 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack I don't agree that we will follow Israel into Iran. IMHO, first thing that happens, Israel takes out the nuke facilities with bunker busters. Then... more talks... no all out war, Iran can't fight a war without their surrogates Hezbollah, Hamas. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
Do you think Hamas and Hezbollah would not join the fray? And Iran is exponentially more powerful and better equipped than any enemy Israel has ever fought with. Iran has a navy and many missles. Hezbollah and likely Hamas would rain rockets on Israel if they invade or bomb Iran. Plus you galvenize the population of Iran that hates the government the second the first bomb drops. IMHO You need to study what has happened recently with Israel and temper that notion I used to have that they are the neighborhood tough guys. The days of the Egyptian Army abandoning tanks and running for cover are long gone. These are fierce fighters who don't really give a shit about living or dying since they will have hundreds of virgins waiting for them, and they love to hide with the civilians. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| the decedent Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: edge of the pacific plate Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,628
Rep Power: 28914 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack ...and the leg bone connected to the hip bone. The hip bone connected to the... |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Fighting for the RIGHT to medicate In Peace. Join Date: Apr 2008 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 720
Rep Power: 68155 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Can anyone here suggest a better way to go about the Afghanistan situation, After all you send that many troops to a war zone and lose so many , you cannot just pull out and say oh dear we would not win so ,, hey it was worth a try, Vietnam anyone ? |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| hello Join Date: Jan 2007 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 470
Rep Power: 17291 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack lets make Afghanistan another state in our great nation and tax them to death..... we can use their dirt to fill the grand canyon. we can use their dope and sell it to china and Russia we can use their labor to build more GM cars without having to pay them nice union people... um, idk, anyone else got something? |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Thats what I would suggest we do. The topography does not allow for "nation building". The longer we stay, the more young people we lose and the more money we waste. |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Fighting for the RIGHT to medicate In Peace. Join Date: Apr 2008 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 720
Rep Power: 68155 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
So your suggesting just pull out and leave the mess to the locals to deal with .. good idea. BUT what do you tell the American people back home. OOPS sorry your son/daughter/wife/husband died because we fkd up again ? . nah problem we can always fk up again so your relative will not be the last. | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| fresh baked Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Tarzana Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 89
Rep Power: 226 | thanx for the new run down it hurts to find out the US is still going to be sending our boys out .... i hope they ALL return safely and healthy ill have a blunt, jay, bong bowl, pipe bowl, vapo bowl, hash bowl, etc ready for them when they come back |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| hello Join Date: Jan 2007 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 470
Rep Power: 17291 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack colonize the place i tell you!! http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3070/pdf/FS09-3070.pdf There are a lot of resources that will keep us there for a long time. If we are not there, someone else will be. If we put taco bells and McDonalds on every street corner maybe we can win their people over to our good life.. ahh the good life.. we need to make them fat, lazy and brain dead .. |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,099
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
What might be funny to you or I is exactly what they are rightly accusing us of, colonizing them. | |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| .:Stay Medicated:. Join Date: Apr 2008 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 655
Rep Power: 42763 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Oh Obama.......! What Is There To Say About This Man? Not All Too Much .:Stay Medicated:. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) | |
| hello Join Date: Jan 2007 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 470
Rep Power: 17291 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
Not just them but probably every country in the Mideast thinks that's what we are doing. What was the downfall of the roman empire? I have done my research for the day project already... | |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) | |
| Stoned Immaculate Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Canoga Park, Fool Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,879
Rep Power: 113264 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
And it wouldn't be the first, nor the last time, the U.S. government's fucked up. Nothing new there. | |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Stoned Immaculate Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Canoga Park, Fool Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 1,879
Rep Power: 113264 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| hello Join Date: Jan 2007 Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 470
Rep Power: 17291 | Re: Say it ain't so, Barack Quote:
the military people are not trained to babysit or police nations.. they are a fighting force. go in take over is what we excel in, the rest of the stay in has been the "oh no" part.. im not an expert at military things though.. so i could be wrong. i admire the commitment the people in the armed forces give. They do a great job. Can you imagine a home invasion, they go in and take control. completely. then after they do, they start fixing the door they kicked in, painting the walls where the blood is, asking if the people want to order a pizza and be friends after the event.. | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |