Quantcast a possible loophole? - WeedTRACKER

Welcome to WeedTRACKER!

You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.

Save ?




Medical Marijuana Politics The politics of MMJ

Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-23-2009, 12:05 AM   1 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
I'm the Ad-min-Diddly-in
 
weedtracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: WeedTRACKER

Co-Op: No
Vendor: no
Patient: Yes

Posts: 7,796

Rep Power: 81816
weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker
weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker weedtracker
a possible loophole?

ok so somebody said something to me today that i think might be something to consider... the big deal is that "sales" of mmj are illegal. that you can spend "money" to "buy" your medicine from a dispensary. well what if you didnt use money? what if you used 'credits' or somekind of "dispesnsary bucks" when you would buy dispensary bucks with real money and then use the dispensary bucks to buy your meds.. your not using "money" anymore in the traditional sense to buy your meds, is that something we could do if they try and stop "sales?"

just a thought..

weedtracker says..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

weedtracker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:11 AM   #2 (permalink)
real real gone
 
Join Date: Mar 2008

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 1,238

Rep Power: 129898
ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull
ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull ShiningSkull
Re: a possible loophole?

Like scrip? Scrip has worked in many different situations.

Scrip - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ShiningSkull is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:17 AM   #3 (permalink)
WT SENIOR MEMBER
 
wallawalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antelope Valley

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 6,119

Rep Power: 259177
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
Re: a possible loophole?

I think in the lines of a patient saying ok I need 1oz for a month in meds and then that patient donates a dollar for each point as needed for the meds. And the meds would go out on a points basis no cash exchanges hands when meds are recieved. Then I think it would be true donations in the eye of the law. What do you think? This is just a rough idea.

wallawalla says..Grow your own!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wallawalla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:25 AM   #4 (permalink)
**People Helping People**
 
Bemysnugglemate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Heaven & Earth

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 2,091

Rep Power: 353312
Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate
Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate
Re: a possible loophole?

To me that would still be money. Some one would still have to collect the funds and guarantee those "Bucks" as equivalence to real money. IMO

What about if each member paid a monthly membership to join and they receive their medication at no fees. (also depending on what plan you donate for will determine the amounts of medications you would receive for the month). Make them tiered plans, that way each patient could pick the best plan for them.

I was very saddened to here about the most recent raids.

Bemysnugglemate says..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

** Patients Helping Patients **
Bemysnugglemate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
WTF am I doing here? How did I get in a dress?
 
nigel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: POLE POSITION.

Co-Op: no
Vendor: NO
Patient: yes

Posts: 852

Rep Power: 24604
nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel
nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel nigel
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bemysnugglemate View Post
To me that would still be money. Some one would still have to collect the funds and guarantee those "Bucks" as equivalence to real money. IMO

What about if each member paid a monthly membership to join and they receive their medication at no fees. (also depending on what plan you donate for will determine the amounts of medications you would receive for the month). Make them tiered plans, that way each patient could pick the best plan for them.

I was very saddened to here about the most recent raids.
I was thinking about something along that line. It could be a "membership fee" or "dues." Pay you're monthly dues, and have a credit for meds. How about this: Monthly dues, but you're dues are paid incrementally, each time you pick up your meds. You are not "buying meds," but rather "paying your dues!????

I wish an attorney could chime in on this one.

nigel says..Please everyone out there be careful, because changes they be a coming.....
nigel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
WT SENIOR MEMBER
 
wallawalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antelope Valley

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 6,119

Rep Power: 259177
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bemysnugglemate View Post
To me that would still be money. Some one would still have to collect the funds and guarantee those "Bucks" as equivalence to real money. IMO

What about if each member paid a monthly membership to join and they receive their medication at no fees. (also depending on what plan you donate for will determine the amounts of medications you would receive for the month). Make them tiered plans, that way each patient could pick the best plan for them.

I was very saddened to here about the most recent raids.


It can be written up as a donation for services of growing/anything besides meds. And that is actually a part of a collective! Another thing that needs to be done is caregivers need to get more involved with patients such as rides to doctors or basically anything makes them a true caregiver

wallawalla says..Grow your own!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by wallawalla; 10-23-2009 at 12:35 AM..
wallawalla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:37 AM   #7 (permalink)
My name says it all. Ask around : )
 
Join Date: Mar 2009

Co-Op: No
Vendor: No
Patient: Yes

Posts: 581

Rep Power: 20653
IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell
IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell IWant2CUWell
Re: a possible loophole?

I told this same idea to numerous collective owners a few weeks ago and they all said it was lame

Honestly I think this is the way to do it. I suggested having patients chip in to pay rent, utilities, etc. and get a reciet for that, or something of the sort. Where there's a will there's a way

IWant2CUWell says..Peace & love to all
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
IWant2CUWell is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
WT SENIOR MEMBER
 
wallawalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antelope Valley

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 6,119

Rep Power: 259177
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
Re: a possible loophole?

It does state that patient of collectives that are not capable of helping in anyway may make monitary donations to defray costs!

wallawalla says..Grow your own!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wallawalla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:43 AM   #9 (permalink)
**People Helping People**
 
Bemysnugglemate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Heaven & Earth

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 2,091

Rep Power: 353312
Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate
Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate Bemysnugglemate
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wallawalla View Post
It can be written up as a donation for services of growing/anything besides meds. And that is actually a part of a collective! Another thing that needs to be done is caregivers need to get more involved with patients such as rides to doctors or basically anything makes them a true caregiver

In the plan of the tiered It could include other items as well needed. I was recently chatting with a private collective along these lines. Food donations as well as a Driver and other support inner groups would be formed to help the patient from within the collective.

Bemysnugglemate says..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

** Patients Helping Patients **
Bemysnugglemate is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
WT SENIOR MEMBER
 
wallawalla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Antelope Valley

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 6,119

Rep Power: 259177
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla wallawalla
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bemysnugglemate View Post
In the plan of the tiered It could include other items as well needed. I was recently chatting with a private collective along these lines. Food donations as well as a Driver and other support inner groups would be formed to help the patient from within the collective.


It would make them more like collectives instead of dispensaries. Plus it will help alot of patients that need the help. I myself am far from rich but always try to donate what I can! Just like you do!!

wallawalla says..Grow your own!!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wallawalla is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:27 AM   #11 (permalink)
Hi, Im New!
 
sandman315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009

Co-Op: yes
Vendor: yes
Patient: yes

Posts: 19

Rep Power: 0
sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315
sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315 sandman315
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by weedtracker View Post
ok so somebody said something to me today that i think might be something to consider... the big deal is that "sales" of mmj are illegal. that you can spend "money" to "buy" your medicine from a dispensary. well what if you didnt use money? what if you used 'credits' or somekind of "dispesnsary bucks" when you would buy dispensary bucks with real money and then use the dispensary bucks to buy your meds.. your not using "money" anymore in the traditional sense to buy your meds, is that something we could do if they try and stop "sales?"

just a thought..
individual members could buy credits then redeen them at the counter
sandman315 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:36 AM   #12 (permalink)
more human than human
 
happyjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LBC

Co-Op: No
Vendor: No
Patient: Yes

Posts: 4,716

Rep Power: 305924
happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack
happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack happyjack
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by weedtracker View Post
ok so somebody said something to me today that i think might be something to consider... the big deal is that "sales" of mmj are illegal. that you can spend "money" to "buy" your medicine from a dispensary. well what if you didnt use money? what if you used 'credits' or somekind of "dispesnsary bucks" when you would buy dispensary bucks with real money and then use the dispensary bucks to buy your meds.. your not using "money" anymore in the traditional sense to buy your meds, is that something we could do if they try and stop "sales?"

just a thought..
In a sense like the way pachinko palaces in Japan pay out good-luck tokens as winnings, which you then take to another storefront and exchange for money. See, no pachinko winnings are paid out as cash, therefore there is no gambling (which is illegal there). Kind of an ostrich-like mentality, but it's effective.


happyjack says..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
...and they couldn't prevent Jack from feeling happy

Need help? Contact the
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
happyjack is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:09 AM   #13 (permalink)
Demon of the Fall
 
fizzer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Santa Clarita, CA

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 49

Rep Power: 918
fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer
fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer fizzer
Re: a possible loophole?

If this ordinance passes, I don't see any other way collectives will be able to operate other than charging membership fees. Collectives need to calculate all of their costs of operation and come up with a membership plan that satisfies their nonprofit status. However, I can't really consider this a loophole, due to Conditions of Operations, Rule #8:

-No medical marijuana collective shall possess more than 5 pounds of dried marijuana or more than 100 plants of any size on the property.

-No collective shall possess marijuana that was not cultivated by the collective either on the property or at its predecessor location..

Collectives can't have more than 100 plants, and they can't get meds anywhere else. Their locations will be monitored by the police and the first thing they'll be looking for are collectives attempting to import weed from another source. Memberships will have to be small. So even with the systems that have been suggested in this thread, I don't see how they'll be able to provide a loophole that will get us out of the pending drastic decrease in supply.

Last edited by fizzer; 10-23-2009 at 02:11 AM..
fizzer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:34 AM   #14 (permalink)
I'm Tired!
 
ScrewyLewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 3rd rock from the sun

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 669

Rep Power: 54391
ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy
ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy ScrewyLewy
Re: a possible loophole?

No this is all bull. Any way it is done it is still the same thing. Some patients need more than others and it cost more. Money is money scrips are money membership fees are money. Lets face it we need to change the damn laws to read a way that the people who voted and every one else gets the medicine they need at a reasonable price. I was in Japan for some time the way they dont gamble with the way too noisy machines is still gambling it the stupidest thing I ever saw. We are better than that and we are adults. Lets call a happy token money. I need medicine it is legal medicine but why can't I buy my medicine without a secret handshake.
I am so pissed off.

ScrewyLewy says.."Happy Smoke for Happy People" "Let's get small"
Please adopt a new friend

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
ScrewyLewy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:56 AM   #15 (permalink)
ya say it, Sea-f-ahs.
 
cephas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in a state of flux.

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 1,351

Rep Power: 147808
cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas
cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas cephas
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScrewyLewy View Post
No this is all bull. Any way it is done it is still the same thing. Some patients need more than others and it cost more. Money is money scrips are money membership fees are money. Lets face it we need to change the damn laws to read a way that the people who voted and every one else gets the medicine they need at a reasonable price. I was in Japan for some time the way they dont gamble with the way too noisy machines is still gambling it the stupidest thing I ever saw. We are better than that and we are adults. Lets call a happy token money. I need medicine it is legal medicine but why can't I buy my medicine without a secret handshake.
I am so pissed off.


Yup.

This is all complete BS, and we cannot stand for it.

We need to write our representatives both city and state.

And we need to write the LA Times...

And we need to show up to the protests.

all three.

Should we have to do this? No. Our representatives should be representing us.

Here is a thought though.

Maybe, because as a group we do not do these things, our representatives do not know who we are.........and cannot represent us.

Just a thought....

cephas says.."Gangsta's and Hoe's are just his generation's Cowboys and Indians...." ~Peggy Hill.

Homer Cheese's say peace out.

Word.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
cephas is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:11 AM   #16 (permalink)
WT Regular
 
washgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 157

Rep Power: 12737
washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl
washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl washgirl
Re: a possible loophole?

Quote:
Originally Posted by weedtracker View Post
ok so somebody said something to me today that i think might be something to consider... the big deal is that "sales" of mmj are illegal. that you can spend "money" to "buy" your medicine from a dispensary. well what if you didnt use money? what if you used 'credits' or somekind of "dispesnsary bucks" when you would buy dispensary bucks with real money and then use the dispensary bucks to buy your meds.. your not using "money" anymore in the traditional sense to buy your meds, is that something we could do if they try and stop "sales?"

just a thought..
I think if co-ops (true co-ops) were created then that problem would be solved. A small group of people would collectively grow their own meds. Everyone (who has the ability) will work the "farm" in one way or another. I think the best shops I have been to have been run by real patients helping patients. Real compassion is shown when there is empathy. Sadly (and we all know this to be true) most shops are NOT owned by patients.
And these are the shops that are making huge profits on the patients! And regardless if we used "credits, beans or buttons" for currency at some point money would have to buy these "credits, beans or buttons" and the same shops selling ounces for 560.00 will still be making a huge profit. Now I don't pretend to know what the recently raided shop(s) were selling their ounces for as I have not been. But I do know that if I can get my meds less from the crack dealer who dabbles in weed on the corner for LESS then there is a profit being made. I do know if that same street dealer now owns a shop he is not in it for compassion and the patients.

I am on the side that thinks Prop 215 needs a major overhaul to protect patients. I think clear guidelines on writing recs need to be written and that should be the first place that get "raided" Dr.s selling recs. NO BODY should be able to go into a Dr with 65-250 bucks point and a random scar and in ten mins leave with a rec! We need to make it OK for our PCPs to write our recs! The social stigma is sad. And until the Drs selling the recs are stopped the social stigma will remain horrible. Why would a PCP want to write a rec when so many bad recs are out there. Most of us personally know at least one person who bought their rec. All of us have seen the kid running out of a shop with his bag in hand with his friends in car wooting and woohooing the party is about to start (and they will start as soon as they get out of the driveway! Start with the Dr.s and you will find that the true patients will not stand for 560 an ounce price and the for profit shops will just fade away and back to the street corners.

washgirl says..And that is just my opinion! People come from far places to get my opinion. Perhaps they laugh all the way home at it. But they still come!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by washgirl; 10-23-2009 at 05:14 AM..
washgirl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:15 AM   #17 (permalink)
om shivaya hara ganja om
 
kennabis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: planet earth

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 2,637

Rep Power: 263700
kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis
kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis kennabis
Re: a possible loophole?

private means private! and, donation and gift kinda explain themselfs

we are being jacked by the domestic military, and, "voted in" enemy city dis-servants

a law suit against the city is what is needed

acts of civil disobedience are right around the corner smoke in's and smoke out's are my mind daily! city halls and police dept's all have good southern exposure

kennabis says..you mean, uhhh, i'm not my name?!?
nope, you're a flesh and blood human, that "uses" a fictitious name!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
kennabis is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:05 AM   #18 (permalink)
WT Regular
 
Col. Kif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 133

Rep Power: 9458
Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif
Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif
Re: a possible loophole?

Here's a link to my original post proposing this....

A proposal I think may help the MMJ community.

Col. Kif
Col. Kif is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:18 AM   #19 (permalink)
WT Regular
 
bigskybuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montana

Co-Op: yes
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 114

Rep Power: 605
bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds
bigskybuds bigskybuds
Re: a possible loophole?

Hey just an idea try having patients pay a monthly fee like going to a gym then you supply the meds that patient needs just like it was rental equipment that is non returnable. You have to have a card to get into the clubs and the monthly fee can cover the meds a patient needs. If you put the membership as a floating scale then patients that dopnt consume as much get this price and so on.....
bigskybuds is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:21 AM   #20 (permalink)
Hi, Im New!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009

Co-Op: yes
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 16

Rep Power: 0
MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op
MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op MotherEarthCo-op
Re: a possible loophole?

even with the limits imposed I think the collectives will have members willing to make sure that 100 plant, 5lbs. limit is maintained every day of the week for all the members to access,case law states a collective members only contribution may be monetary,that means all a member has to do is show up at the collective and and give his share for the 1/8 of meds and go home ,the wording and structure will change but I think things can continue close to the same
MotherEarthCo-op is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:30 AM   #21 (permalink)
Part of the Solution
 
Smilodon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 1,044

Rep Power: 62282
Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon
Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon Smilodon
Re: a possible loophole?

Problem is money is the root of all evil, as well as necessary for continued collective operation (i.e., rent, nutes, equipments, electricity, etc.). Cooperative share plans I think are the way to go, but you have to account for the real need for actual money to change hands as well since at some point the collective needs to deal with the real world.

Smilodon says..
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"If you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem."
Smilodon is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:07 AM   #22 (permalink)
Space Monkey Extraordinaire
 
tooweirdtolivetooraretodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pasadena

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 243

Rep Power: 10280
tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie
tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie tooweirdtolivetooraretodie
Re: a possible loophole?

I think trying to play the "loophole" game is a bad long term plan and will only complicate the short term. Even then, would it still appease the anti-mmj crowd? Not too likely. This is an old fashioned political fight. I think it's better to be righteous and straight forward. We have been granted a legal right through a legal vote by the majority of Californians. The people who watch news and follow politics but don't use mj or mmj, are distracted from this right now by bigger issues, but would still likely side with us. In my opinion, I think this movement just needs to throw itself into the mainstream, celebrity spokespeople that the average person in BFE can relate to and the same kind of commercials that other political movements and parties use to get and sway attention and favor. I just don't think backing down or giving in to bullies, that's all these tactics amount to, is ever the right thing to do.


Here's a fun quote I think of when I see these city hall people on TV spewing their nonsense.

"Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... fuck with us." -Fight Club

I bet there's many WT'ers that work in similar positions, cops, lawyers, politicians, et al come and patronize your establishment, blindly trusting that you're doing your job appropriately and following the rules, not out to hurt customers that do not see things in the same way. Can they really expect that, if they themselves don't do that and go even further by creating an adversarial situation? I'm certainly not advocating taking any sort of illegal action, but we all know what you risk when you anger the restaurant staff and your food is out of your sight.
tooweirdtolivetooraretodie is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:10 AM   #23 (permalink)
Dictators and Tyrants
 
KuShRoCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: southern cali.

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 281

Rep Power: 2877
KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC
KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC KuShRoCC
Re: a possible loophole?

Membership fees are the only option that reflects our current health care system. We will pay a membership fee(like current health care providers.), and depending on how much meds you need a month will reflect your payment plan. I am sure there are lots of possibilities to the solution.

KuShRoCC says..Welcome, KuShRoCC.
619 Unread Posts since your last visit.
KuShRoCC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:14 AM   #24 (permalink)
WT Regular
 
bigskybuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montana

Co-Op: yes
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 114

Rep Power: 605
bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds bigskybuds
bigskybuds bigskybuds
Re: a possible loophole?

shouldnt it all be free?? thats the big question...i think the government should be worried about how they are going to controll the population and save our planet
bigskybuds is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 10:53 AM   #25 (permalink)
WT Regular
 
Col. Kif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009

Co-Op: NO
Vendor: NO
Patient: YES

Posts: 133

Rep Power: 9458
Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif
Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif Col. Kif
Re: a possible loophole?

Since my original thread isn't seeing the activity this one is... I am crossposting my original post.... As you can see this isn't a "loophole", it's a strategy to help take the bite out of our opposition. We need to show we are a self regulating and responsible community, not profiteering drug dealers.

First let me thank you in advance for reading this.

I have what I believe to be a possible solution that may help ease the busts on MMJ Dispensaries wether run by Co-ops or Collectives.

Our opposition keeps citing the "Illegal Sale" of Marijuana as a prime motivating source. How about we remove that source?

What I propose is a change in how Donations and the dispensing of Medical Marijuana occurs. The idea is simple and as far as I, as a layman, can see would seem to help us conform more tightly to the model of a not for profit entity wether Co-op or Collective.

It would require more book keeping, but both models allow for both volunteers and employees to do this.

Simply separate the donation of money from the transfer of the Medicine. Allow members and patients to make donations and in turn, recieve donation vouchers. This would be transacted separately and away from the dispensing of Medicine. No money changes hands for Medicine. Medicines are distributed in a fair manner based on a patients donation or participation in a Co-Op or Collective.

All the Budtender/Volunteer need do is look in the database to see where a registered and verified patient's donation voucher level is at. The Voucher is proof of donation to the not for profit entity. No money changes hands at the time the patient recieves thier medicine so no "sale" is created. You don't pay sales tax on donations to a not for profit entity. You pay sales tax on sales.

I am interested to see what people think of this idea. Especially those among us who are activist and community leaders.

I know I'm new to the community but I feel strongly that this could help us in our fight to keep access safe & Patient rights as well as privacy intact.

Regards,

Col. Kif
Col. Kif is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.weedtracker.com/forums/medical-marijuana-politics-1189/possible-loophole-162808.html
Posted By For Type Date
a possible loophole? - WeedTRACKER This thread Refback 10-23-2009 12:59 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2008, Dogpatch Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
WeedTRACKER.com & the Ganja Radar Logo are Registered Trademarks of Dogpatch Media, LLC.
No duplication permitted without prior written permission.


Follow us on Twitter



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159