You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.
| Medical Marijuana Politics The politics of MMJ |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Part of the Solution Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: San Diego Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 1,223
Rep Power: 154582 | Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment to End DEA Medical Marijuana Raids Disappointing Showing for Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment to End DEA Medical Marijuana Raids Despite the strong shift in last year's election, opponents of the DEA's war on medical marijuana made scant headway in Washington, as Congress rejected a measure to end Dept. of Justice funding for federal medical marijuana raids for the fifth year in a row. The Hinchey-Rohrabacher amendment, co-sponsored by Orange County Republican Dana Rohrabacher, was defeated on a vote of 165-262, hardly better than last year's vote of 163-259. As usual, California's delegation voted strongly in favor of the measure, though not by quite as strong a margin as last year. The state's Democrats voted 26-4 in favor, while Republicans voted 3-17 against. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) spoke on behalf of the amendment on the floor. In a surprising vote, freshman Democrat Jerry McNerney (Pleasanton) voted no, the only Bay Area Congress member to do so. In a breathtaking non sequitur, McNerney tried to explain, "We are facing a drug crisis with meth and other drug use on the Rise. Until we get a handle on the crippling drug use in our society, I can not support the relaxation of current drug policy." Other Democrats voting no included Rep. Jim Costa (Fresno), who switched his vote from last year, plus fellow "Valley Democrats" Dennis Cardoza (Merced) and Joe Baca (San Bernardino). As usual, Republicans overwhelmingly opposed the measure. Two Orange County Republicans, John Campbell (Newport Beach) and Ed Royce(Fullerton) joined Rohrabacher in opposing the DEA raids. The disappointing outcome reflected several factors: the continuing lack of interest in DEA medical marijuana raids outside California; the political strength of the DEA in Washington DC; and the essential legislative weakness of the amendment itself, which did not try to change federal law but rather to withhold funding for its enforcement, a clumsy and imperfect remedy for fixing bad laws. Congressional insiders say it will require a change of leadership in the White House to effect any change in federal marijuana policy. Congressional vote at http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll733.xml. Vote on Hinchey-Rohrabacher: 165 to 262 150 D say yes, 80 say no 15 R say yes, 182 say no 2 more Yes votes than last year 3 more No votes ************************************************** ********* Haven't seen this posted and it is definately information we need. Hopefully the reclassification petition filed by Gettman in 2002 is having more success. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| WT Regular Join Date: Dec 2007 Co-Op: NO Vendor: NO Patient: YES
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 12 | Re: Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment to End DEA Medical Marijuana Raids Thanks for the informitive post... allthough it's depressing news. Seems that a change of leadership in the White House is our only hope. |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |