You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.
| ASA Blog Automatic reposting of stories posted to Americans for Safe Access Blog. |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Automatic Posting robot Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11,884
Rep Power: 50835 | Coburn Amendment Round II I am blogging with good news from Washington, DC.* Today, ASA helped to kill an amendment aimed at obstructing the effective implementation of duly enacted state medical cannabis laws! Earlier this week, ASA’s National Office was notified that Sen. Coburn (R-OK) intended to add a medical marijuana amendment to S. 982, the Family Smoking Prevention [...] Read the rest of this article on Americans for Safe Access Website by clicking here. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Weed Wizard Of Westwood Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Santa Monica Co-Op: no Vendor: no Patient: yes
Posts: 7,105
Rep Power: 127208 | Re: Coburn Amendment Round II WOW! We have true enemies trying to take our meds away! That amendment would bring the Feds into our business in a terrible way. What a weak ass attempt at DIRTY politics! |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| I'm the Ad-min-Diddly-in Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: WeedTRACKER Co-Op: No Vendor: no Patient: Yes
Posts: 7,796
Rep Power: 81816 | Re: Coburn Amendment Round II Coburn Amendment Round II May 20th, 2009 Posted by Caren Woodson I am blogging with good news from Washington, DC. Today, ASA helped to kill an amendment aimed at obstructing the effective implementation of duly enactedstate medical cannabis laws! Earlier this week, ASA’s National Office was notified that Sen. Coburn (R-OK) intended to add a medical marijuana amendment to S. 982, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Frustrated by the Obama Administration’s continued pledge to not interfere with state medical marijuana laws, Sen. Coburn (R-OK) attempted to slip in legislation designed to undermine these programs. The text of Sen. Coburn’s amendment is as follows: SEC._. MEDICAL MARIJUANA. The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall- (1) require that State-legalized medical marijuana shall be subject to the full regulatory requirements of the Food and Drug Administration, including a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy and all other requirements and penalties of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 USC 301 et seq.) regarding safe and effective reviews, approval, sale, marketing, and use of pharmaceuticals; and (2) require that any State-legalized marijuana likely to be offered to, or purchase by, consumers as marijuana intended to be consumed as a cigarette or through the oral cavity will be subject to section 900 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (as amended by section 101).” At present, the ONLY way for medical marijuana to be properly evaluated by the FDA is for privately-funded sponsors to conduct FDA-approved clinical trials (like any other drug evaluation). If Senator Coburn’s intentions with regard to the medical efficacy of marijuana were genuine, he would consider first removing the monopoly imposed by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on licenses for the cultivation of medical-grade cannabis for research purposes. Currently, the DEA exclusively licenses the cultivation of medical-grade cannabis to the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA), which primarily investigates only the negative effects of cannabis. This monopoly obstructs any investigation and research in the U.S. into the medical properties of cannabisand thwarts the normal drug approval process. This isn’t the first time Sen. Coburn has attempted to add this amendment to unrelated legislation. Recall, he made a similar attempt in 2007 when he tried to append the amendment to an unrelated FDA prescription drug bill. In fact, then-Senators Obama and Clinton voted against the measure. While Sen Coburn managed to slip it in at committee level, ASA managed to get it removed during conference committee. Today, in a 10-13 party-line vote, we managed to kill the amendment in Committee! Senators Dodd (D-CT) and Reed (D-RI) were key opponents to the amendment. SEND YOUR THANKS and PRAISE to the each of the following offices: Senator Bingaman (D, NM) Phone: (202) 224-5521 Email: senator_bingaman@bingaman.senate.gov Senator Brown (D, OH) Phone: (202) 224-2315 Email: http://brown.senate.gov/contact/ Senator Casey (D, PA) Phone: (202) 224-6324 Email: http://casey.senate.gov/contact/ Senator Dodd (D, CT) Phone: (202) 224-2823 Email: http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3128 Senator Hagan (D, NC) Phone: (202) 224-6342 Email: http://hagan.senate.gov/?p=contact Senator Harkin (D, IA) Phone: (202) 224-3254 Email: http://harkin.senate.gov/c/ Senator Kennedy (D, MA) Phone: (202) 224-4543 Email: http://kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm Senator Merkley (D, OR) Phone: (202) 224-3753 Email: http://merkley.senate.gov/contact/ Senator Mikulski (D, MD) Phone: (202) 224-4654 Email: http://mikulski.senate.gov/Contact/contact.cfm Senator Murray (D, WA) Phone: (202) 224-2621 Email: http://murray.senate.gov/email/index.cfm Senator Reed (D, RI) Phone: (202) 224-4642 Email: http://reed.senate.gov/contact/contact-share.cfm Senator Sanders (I, VT) Phone: (202) 224-5141 Email: http://sanders.senate.gov/comments/ Senator Whitehouse (D, RI) Phone: (202) 224-2921 Email: http://whitehouse.senate.gov/contact/ |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |