Quantcast *Congressional MMJ Bill Lifts Ban on Evidence in Federal court - WeedTRACKER

Welcome to WeedTRACKER!

You are currently showing up as a guest, to take full advantage of the site please read the rules & sign up.

Save ?




Americans for Safe Access 1322 Webster St., Oakland, Ca.
Phone: (510) 251-1856
Map: Click Here
Web: Click Here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-27-2009, 09:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
The intuition of free will gives us the truth.
 
Justonevoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007

Co-Op: No
Vendor: No
Patient: Yes

Posts: 2,486

Rep Power: 62165
Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice
Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice Justonevoice
*Congressional MMJ Bill Lifts Ban on Evidence in Federal court

/"Truth in Trials" Act corrects unfair trials, complements recent DOJ
guidelines/

*Washington, D.C.* -- U.S. Representative Sam Farr (D-CA) and more than twenty original bipartisan co-sponsors introduced legislation today that would allow defendants in medical marijuana cases the ability to use medical evidence at trial, a right not currently afforded them.
Because of a June 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in /Gonzales v. Raich/, the government has the discretion to enforce federal marijuana laws even in medical marijuana states.
The /Raich /ruling also allows federal prosecutors to exclude evidence of medical use or state law compliance in federal trials, all but guaranteeing convictions of medical marijuana
patients and providers.

Last week, the U.S. Attorney General issued guidelines to federal
prosecutors discouraging them from prosecuting cases in which patients
and providers are "in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing
state laws." Unfortunately, the guidelines neither direct U.S. Attorneys to abandon the more than two-dozen pending federal medical marijuana cases, nor allow defendants the ability to use medical evidence to exonerate themselves.
"This is a common sense bill that will help stop the waste of law enforcement and judicial resources that have been spent prosecuting individuals who are following state law," Rep. Farr said on
Tuesday. "We need strict drug laws, but we also need to apply a little
common sense to how they're enforced. This legislation is about treating defendants in cases involving medical marijuana fairly, plain and simple."

During the Bush Administration, more than a hundred federal cases were
prosecuted by U.S. Attorneys against medical marijuana patients and
providers who were prevented from using medical evidence at trial.
Because of an inability to properly defend themselves, scores of people have been convicted and have received sentences of up to 20 years in federal prison.
While the Justice Department guidelines may result in
fewer federal prosecutions, they are unlikely to assist defendants
currently being prosecuted. Underscoring the need for the "Truth in
Trials" Act, San Diego U.S. Attorney Karen Hewitt, a Bush appointee,
recently responded to the guidelines by claiming she still does not have to prove a violation of state law before prosecuting someone under federal law.

"The 'Truth in Trials' Act will restore the balance of justice and bring fundamental fairness to federal medical marijuana trials," said Caren Woodson, Government Affairs Director with Americans for Safe Access, the legislation' s endorser. "This legislation complements the recent Justice Department guidelines for federal prosecutors and is now more necessary than ever."

Routinely, federal prosecutors seek long prison sentences in medical
marijuana cases. Charles C. Lynch, a locally licensed medical marijuana dispensary operator from Morro Bay, California who had the support of his City Council and local Chamber of Commerce, was prosecuted and convicted under the Bush Administration.
Although Lynch was accused by the federal government of violating state law, he could not use evidence of his compliance with state law at trial. "I was denied an affirmative defense despite my strict adherence to local and state medical marijuana laws," said Lynch. "Passage of this bill will allow jurors to hear the entire story." Lynch is currently released on bail pending his appeal.

The "Truth in Trials" bill has been introduced by Congress in past
sessions, but is especially relevant now that the Obama Administration
has changed federal policy on medical marijuana. At the time of
introduction, the "Truth in Trials" bill had been endorsed by a diverse group of more than three-dozen advocacy, health, and legal
organizations, including Americans for Safe Access (ASA), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), National Association of People With AIDS
(NAPWA), National Minority AIDS Council (NMAC), and AIDS Action Council. The "Truth in Trials" bill is likely to be referred to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. A companion bill has yet to be introduced in the U.S. Senate.

/*Contact ASA at 510-681-6361 to coordinate interviews with current
federal defendants and those convicted without a defense

Justonevoice says.." To taste the real flavor of success, we must combine failures, passions and courage all together in one action."

Johni Pangalila
Justonevoice is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:56 AM   #2 (permalink)
Weed Wizard Of Westwood
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Monica

Co-Op: no
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 7,099

Rep Power: 127208
BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher
BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher BrattonBasher
Re: *Congressional MMJ Bill Lifts Ban on Evidence in Federal court

This is good news! After trials when they interview jurors they often lash out at the MMJ defense being barred.
BrattonBasher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 09:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
WT Senior Member
 
silvercloud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: venice beach

Co-Op: non
Vendor: no
Patient: yes

Posts: 2,103

Rep Power: 36071
silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud
silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud silvercloud
Re: *Congressional MMJ Bill Lifts Ban on Evidence in Federal court

Good find ~ Federal wheels can turn slow ,but when they move ,they start to turn the tide ~ we're getting closer by the day to vindication for all ~ that is all

silvercloud says..Try to keep an open
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
"3rdEye" wherever ,whenever .....

"If life doesn't wait ,why wait on life" ... ?/? .....
silvercloud is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
asa , evidence , federal law

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2008, Dogpatch Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
WeedTRACKER.com & the Ganja Radar Logo are Registered Trademarks of Dogpatch Media, LLC.
No duplication permitted without prior written permission.


Follow us on Twitter



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159